Art History Survey Delphi Dissertation Study

This study suggests several leading learning taxonomies for consideration in rethinking the outcomes for the art history survey course. This area houses links and resources for understanding more about Bloom's (1956) Taxonomy, Fink's (2003) Significant Learning Taxonomy, and the Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2009) framework. There are several other taxonomies such as Bloom's Revised Taxonomy (Anderson, Krathwohl, & Bloom, 2001) or Bloom's Digital Taxonomy (Churches, 2009) that may also be considered for discussion, but were not included in the initial literature review for this research.

Bloom's Taxonomy Related links:

Bloom et al.'s taxonomy of the cognitive domain (Huitt, 2011)
Bloom's Taxonomy Cheat Sheet by Francie Kugelman

Fink's Taxonomy for Significant Learning

Fink's Taxonomy Related Links:

Dee Fink & Associates
A Self-Directed Guide to Designing Courses for Significant Learning (Fink, 2005)
Designing Significant Learning Experiences: Good handouts based on the significant learning taxonomy.

P21 Framework for 21st Century Learning

21st Century Student Outcomes and Support Systems

Partnership for 21st Century Skills Resources:

All resources can be found on or through their website: Partnership for 21st Century Skills (P21.org)

Works Cited:

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Bloom, B. S. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Allyn & Bacon.

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. New York: D. McKay.

Delphi Dissertation

Learning Taxonomies